Unfortunately this page does not have a mobile or narrow screen view. Please switch to a desktop computer or increase the size of your browser. For tablets try flipping the screen.
Data Publication
What controls sill formation: an overview from analogue models
Sili, Giulia | Urbani, Stefano | Acocella, Valerio
GFZ Data Services
(2019)
This data publication includes movies and figures of twenty-six analogue models which are used to investigate what controls sill emplacement, defining a hierarchy among a selection of the proposed factors: compressive stresses, interface strength between layers, rigidity contrast between layers, density layering, ratio of layer thickness, magma flow rate and driving buoyancy pressure (Sili et al., 2019). Crust layering is simulated by pig-skin gelatin layers and magma intrusions is simulated by colored water. The experimental set-up is composed of a 40.5 X 29 X 40 cm3 clear-Perspex tank where a mobile wall applies a deviatoric compressive stress (C, in Table 1) to the solid gelatin (Figure 1). In each experiment is imposed two layers with different density and rigidity, separated by a weak or strong interface, excluding two experiments characterized by homogeneous gelatin (experiment 4 and 12). Three different rigidity contrast (1, 1.3, 1.8) between the two layers are imposed, defined as the ratio between the Young’s moduli of the upper (Eu) and lower (El) layer. By using NaCl and gelatin concentration, two layers with same rigidity but different densities are obtained, investigating the influence of the density contrasts on sill emplacement. The effects of the ratio between layer thicknesses (i.e. the ratio between upper and lower layer thickness: Thu/Thl) was simulated by changing only the thickness of the upper layer; while magma flow rate are studied changing the flow rate of peristaltic pump. Water density was increased by adding NaCl to analyze the effect of changing driving buoyancy pressure (Pm) that depends on the density difference between host rock and magma (Δρ), gravitational acceleration (g) and intrusion length (H). In the table different colors indicate the experiment result: black = dike; red = sill and blue = sheet. The here provided material includes time-lapse movies showing intrusion propagation of the twenty-six models with a velocity of 5 times higher compared to the real time (1 second in the movie is 25 real seconds). These visualizations are side (XZ or YZ plane in Figure 1) and/or top views (XY plane in Figure 1).
Keywords
Originally assigned keywords
Corresponding MSL vocabulary keywords
MSL enriched keywords
MSL original sub domains
MSL enriched sub domains i
Source publisher
GFZ Data Services
DOI
10.5880/fidgeo.2019.008
Authors
Sili, Giulia
0000-0001-5333-7254
Universitá degli studi "Roma TRE", Rome, Italy
Urbani, Stefano
0000-0002-0421-022X
Universitá degli studi "Roma TRE", Rome, Italy
Acocella, Valerio
0000-0002-1258-9401
Universitá degli studi "Roma TRE", Rome, Italy
References
Sili, G., Urbani, S., & Acocella, V. (2019). What Controls Sill Formation: An Overview From Analogue Models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124(8), 8205–8222. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jb017005
10.1029/2018JB017005
IsSupplementTo
Contact
Sili Giulia
giulia.sili210@gmail.com
Universitá degli studi "Roma TRE", Rome, Italy
Citiation
Sili, G., Urbani, S., & Acocella, V. (2019). What controls sill formation: an overview from analogue models [Data set]. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/FIDGEO.2019.008